Or perhaps legal court documents and settled case law prove the conspiracy.

There’s the 1990 consent decree signed by former Sen. Jesse Helms (R-NC) after Helms’ re-election campaign, when the North Carolina Republican Party and four campaign consulting and marketing firms were charged with violating the Voting Rights Act. The campaign allegedly sent 81,000 postcards threatening voters in 81 predominately black districts with five years in prison if anything on their voter registration was incorrect, according to the Associated Press.

Then there’s the 2017 federal court decision which ruled, for the fifth time, that Texas’ voter ID law was designed to discriminate against black voters. A separate appeals court ruled the same thing about North Carolina’s voter ID law, explaining that legislators “requested data on the use, by race, of a number of voting practices,” then used it to “target African Americans with almost surgical precision.”

As Anna Merlan said, a conspiracy actually exists when “a small group of people are working in secret against the common good, to create harm, to effect some negative change in society, to seize power for themselves.”

By that definition, Wisconsin’s Republican voter suppression efforts fit the description of a conspiracy when Rep. Glen Grothman declared that his state’s new voter ID law would help the eventual GOP presidential nominee winWisconsin in the 2016 election. And after the state’s black voter turnout fell sharply as predicted, Wisconsin Attorney General Brad Schimel announced that the law helped Trump win Wisconsin.

Just in case you need data-based proof, how about some academic research? Peer-reviewed studies in GeorgiaKansasTexasIndiana, Maryland, MississippiAlabama, Florida and South Carolina all show that Voter ID laws equal voter suppression, specifically for non-white voters.

After several states enacted voter ID restrictions, a national poll by the Atlantic and the Public Religion Research Institute showed that, in the 2016 election, 9 percent of black voters were told they lacked proper identification to vote versus just 3 percent of white voters. Twice as many black voters (10 percent) than white voters (5 percent) were incorrectly told that their names had been purged from voter rolls.

Another paper by researchers at the University of California San Diego found that voter ID laws disproportionately affect African Americans voters (pdf). Unlike most research that used voter turnout reports that compared turnout before and after Voter ID laws, which change from election to election (for instance, black voter turnout was higher for Barack Obama’s election than for George W. Bush), the UCSD study compared turnout nationwide between states with strict ID laws and those without. The study concluded that strict voter identification laws “substantially alter the makeup of who votes and ultimately do skew democracy in favor of whites and those on the political right.”

Researchers also know that voter purges are more likely to erase black and minority voters from state rolls, and voter purges have dramatically increased, according to the Brennan Center. And despite numerous reports that highlighted the flawed Crosscheck data program that disproportionately flags African American voters to be purged, 30 states still use the system, coincidentally promoted by Kris Kobach, the aforementioned head of Trump’s election integrity committee and advocate for the myth of voter fraud.

See how it all comes full circle?


But, like most conspiracy theories, until you read the facts, it all seems too crazy to be true.

It sounds as preposterous as the government poisoning black people in St. Louis with big fans. The U.S. vote suppression scheme seems as crazy as a four-decade medical experiment on black Alabama farmers. Saying that North Carolina Republicans prevent black people from voting is almost as ludicrous as announcing that the state had a Department of Eugenics to prevent black babies from being born, which is to say …

It is 100 percent real.